For the past week I have been 'sans Internet' at
home, which has been very inconvenient at times. I found this out when I
decided to check my email one morning and discovered that my broadband, which
had worked perfectly the previous evening, was no longer working. At this
point, I telephoned my provider in an attempt to establish what was happening.
Despite having the name 'British' in the title,
the call centre for this company is located in India. Now I have no problem with this
provided that a. the person with whom I am speaking has a good command of the
English language and b. does the job for which they are being paid.
Unfortunately, whilst all those who answered my
several phone calls met criteria a, they were appalling when it came to
criteria b!
The first person that I spoke to, after several
minutes, initially informed me that I
had never
had broadband. When I pointed out that I had been with my provider at my
current address since July 2007, she informed me that I was moving house,
arguing with me when I told her that I wasn't. Finally, she informed me that my
broadband had been seized. I asked what this meant, and was told that it meant
that my broadband had been seized. However, this lady was unable to tell me why
my broadband had been seized, but knew someone who could and transferred me to
a British lady, who informed me that my broadband had been seized.
When I asked her why my broadband had been seized,
she initially informed me that according to her records, I had never had
broadband at my current address. I told her that I had been with my provider at
my current address since July 2007. She even asked if my landline was still working. I pointed out that
we wouldn't actually be speaking if it wasn't. This lady then established that because my original contact was
with BT-Yahoo, I needed to speak to someone else. Cue gentleman in
Indian call centre.
As with the previous two people with whom I spoke,
I was asked for my name, my telephone number, some security questions and the
nature of my problem. Having done all this, I was firstly told that I had never
had broadband at my address and was then told that my broadband had been
seized. However he could not tell me why it had been seized and I was put on
hold whilst being transferred to the person who could help me.
After five minutes a very cheery man asked me for
my name and telephone number. I explained that I had already given it to the
three previous people that I spoke to but he just kept asking for my name and
telephone number.
Obviously, I had got the man who was new and
wouldn't deviate from his script. I, a couple of years ago, when speaking to
one of these call centres, had got the person who had the script, and if you
interrupted them or asked a question, went back to the start of the script and
repeated everything that she had just said!
So, when I asked cheery man to put me through to a
supervisor, he refused (that was obviously not in the script!) Eventually, my
patience ran out and I put the phone down.
Several hours later, I tried again, but decided
that I would use the approach of speaking to someone in the UK. So, when I got through to India, I asked for the UK
telephone number. Four times I did this, and on each occasion, I was informed
that I would be put on hold. On each occasion, because of the inactivity, the
phone cut out.
On the fifth occasion, I got the comedian. This
was the one that, when I asked for a UK telephone number, put me on hold, but
kept cutting in with 'would you like to speak to my supervisor?' and then put
me back on hold again when I told him that I wanted the UK phone number. After
the sixth time of asking and my response of 'Which bit of I want to speak to
someone in the UK don't you understand you moron!' he cut me off.
On the seventh occasion, I got through to someone
who, after leaving me on hold for five minutes informed me that they are only a
call centre and do not have any numbers for anyone in the UK.
So, I decided to use the phone book, and I called
the BT Head Office in London. It has a
London address, it has a London phone number, and it diverts to the bloody call
centre in India! I hung up when answered!
Next I tried calling the local BT business office with a local (to me)
number. I got through to a very helpful lady who agreed that the call centre
personnel are useless and who gave me another number 'up North somewhere'. I
called the number and it rang twice before a recorded message informed me that
the number was no longer in use and that I needed to dial another number.
Guess where the other number was for. Go on, guess. Yup! INDIAN BLOODY CALL
CENTRE!!!
Eventually, after speaking to four more people, I
found out what the problem was. Apparently, BT had sent me a bill in October and I
hadn't paid it. Because of this, they had written to me asking me to pay it,
and I had not replied. They had then written to me and told me that if I didn't
pay it they would cut off my broadband service. Finally, on December 1st they
had sent me a final bill and my service was stopped on 9th December.
However, when I looked at the final bill that had
arrived the previous day, I noticed that there was a slight problem. The person
to whom it was addressed was indeed me, the street name, town name, county name
and post code were all correct. The problem was that there was no house number,
which explained why I had probably not received the other letters.
So when I spoke to the final woman, I explained
this. She informed me of the address that I had, which was correct, including
the house number. However, when I told her that the only letter I seemed to
have received from them was missing this vital element of the address, if the
others were the same that would explain why they had not been received. This
woman then argued with me that because they had my correct address it was
not possible that the house number had been missed off. She relented when I
offered to photocopy and send the letter to her complaints department and
wanted to know her name so that I could inform them that she had called me a liar.
So now it came to sorting out the problem. I told
her that I would pay the outstanding amount by card and asked when I would
be reconnected. I was told that because of their error in not having the
correct address for me, which meant that I received no bills from them, and
therefore they 'seized' my line, that I would be treated as a new customer and
would have no service for five to ten working days. At this point I informed
her that this was not quick enough and would go elsewhere for my service.
Consequently, this is my first Sky broadband post.
As for the outstanding bill, I will eventually pay
it, but it is tempting to wait for them to phone, put on a series of stupid
voices/accents, put them on hold a lot and cut them off at regular intervals
before telling them that it will take two weeks for the bill to be paid.
However, if they can provide proof that they have culled all of the useless
oxygen thieves that I dealt with last week, then I will pay immediately.
Speaking of useless oxygen thieves I have had what
I hope will be my final dealings with the CSA.
About six weeks ago, my ex-wife returned to work.
At this point I telephoned the CSA and informed them of this fact and
that the arrears that she had not paid as she was on benefits could now be paid.
Having heard nothing back, I telephoned again two
weeks ago and spoke with David Grey who had charge of the communal brain cell
that day (they really should be more careful who they let loose with it).
Firstly, he informed me the amount that my ex-wife owed, and then informed me
that she wouldn't be paying it at present as she was, according to CSA records, on benefits. I explained
(slowly) that she had returned to work, informing him that I had explained this
to his colleague four weeks previously. He told me that he would need to speak
to my case worker, Sharon Hughes, but that she was not in until that afternoon,
and that he would get her to call me. My last words to him were 'So she will
definitely call me this afternoon?' and I was assured that she would.
Five days later, having heard nothing (no, I
wasn't really surprised either) I telephoned again. However, when I asked for
Sharon Hughes by name I was told that she wasn't my case worker. I suggested
that David Grey had lied to me when he'd said that she was, but the woman I was
speaking to got very snappy, informing me that she had been, but had moved to a
different job the day after I was expecting a call from her. Convenient!
I therefore had to explain the whole business to
her, and pointed out that the incompetence of her agency and colleagues was of
epic proportions, and that I wanted the whole thing sorted out immediately, if
not sooner.
Having again got quite snappy and having denied
that the CSA was incompetent, I was then placed on
hold whilst she did some 'checks'.
What these checks revealed were that my ex-wife is
no longer on benefits and that she owed me four times the amount that Grey had
told me. When I asked her how long the CSA had had the information and she had
told me, I asked her to justify her denials of incompetence when Grey
had access to the same information but had told me completely different things.
No response.
The upshot was that she would telephone my ex, ask
her about payments and would call me back, which she did the following day.
However, in the true spirit of incapability that the CSA is founded upon, it appears that this woman had got the final figure wrong and that
David Grey had been correct in what he told me was the sum owed. And yes, I did
tell this woman that she was upholding the incompetence of her agency.
With the card payment now made, that is hopefully
the last time that I will have to deal with those cretins at the CSA,
although I am sure that they will, at some point, cock up when it comes to my
paying for my children, but I'll deal with that when it happens.